Home
KLOG
 
[Most Recent Entries] [Calendar View] [Friends View]

Sunday, September 18th, 2005

    Time Event
    2:00p
    The Adventures of a First-Year Teacher
    Where have I been for the last month? Buried in the work of a first-year teacher! My first three weeks of teaching have gone well overall, but there is SO MUCH WORK TO DO!!! And I have small class sizes! So I'm overwhelmed, but no major complaints. In fact, I feel very blessed with the situation that I have. In compliance with the Baldrige model of cooperative management used at my Middle School, here is a Plus (Good things) -Delta (Things that could improve) list:

    Plus:
    1) Everyone, from the teachers to the administration to building services, is super nice and supportive. This has definitely made my first few weeks of teaching manageable. The school has a good, cooperative atmosphere.
    2) I have, on the whole, small class sizes, which makes the variety of abilities pretty manageable.
    3) I only have about ten students on my IEP caseload, which is a nice size for a first year case manager.
    4) I have not yet had to give out a referral to the office or call security, though I have given out a couple of lunch detentions.
    5) I have not yet received any complaints from parents, nor has the Special Education Resource Teacher. Apparently this is a good sign for the first three weeks of school.

    Delta:
    1) There is so much to do! I better get more efficient at all of this, because some nights I am at school until 8PM and I still don't finish everything that I plan to do. I want to plan ahead by several days, but I am constantly re-adjusting my lessons and discovering new challenges or students who can work ahead, so it is difficult to plan very far ahead, even if I had time. I think that all of this stuff gets easier as time goes by. I hope it does!
    2) The main reason why the entire school did not make AYP (Adequate Yearly Progress) last year was Special Ed Math. This is what I am teaching (though many of the special ed students are in general ed classes this year). This is stressful, as there is a lot of responsibility resting on me to raise standardized test scores. I suppose that I can just do my best and hope for the best when the dreaded Maryland State Assessments come around.
    3) There is a lot of pressure to get through the entire curriculum. There is a lot of curriculum. I also need to do a lot of remediation, and the teachers last year did not get through the entire curiculum so there was some stuff that was never taught (though I haven't reached that part yet). I feel like if I teach one ineffective lesson (which I've pretty much already done) and I have to reteach something, I've already derailed the class and we'll never get caught back up.

    I still think that I made the right decision to go into teaching, but I want to be a Master Teacher without having to be a first-year teacher!

    Current Mood: hopeful
    Current Music: I-tunes shuffle of everything
    2:02p
    A Brilliant Idea
    I have a letter that I need to write to Congress, but I haven't found time to write it yet. I thought I would share my brilliant idea on LJ anyway, though.

    According to NCLB, schools need to acheive a 100% pass rate on their state exams by 2013 (or somewhere around there) or they will be a "failing school" according to NCLB. Does any population ever acheive a 100% pass rate on anything? I have a feeling that the law will change before 2013, but this is how it is currently in the books.

    So now, my brilliant idea: Congress and the Executive branch wrote a law stating that standardized testing is the way to tell if our students are learning. Of course, our lawmakers should set a shining example for America's students. How can they do that? Every congress and executive member should show the public how fun and effective standardized tests are by taking the High School exit-level exams in Language Arts, Math, Social Studies, and Science. If Congress and the executive branch do not acheive a 100% pass rate, we should cut off their federal funding and set up an improvement plan for them.

    In addition, every Congress member should be highly qualified. How can they prove this? Tests, of course! Everyone in Congress should have to pass standardized tests about American government and civics, American history, Geography, International Affairs, Public Relations, Economics, etc. If they are not deemed "highly qualified", then the government should send a letter home to all of their constituents sharing the fact that they are not "highly qualified." (If a teacher is not deemed "highly qualified", all of the parents of the teacher's students receive a letter stating this fact.)

    I applaud our government's effort to improve education by giving everyone more standardized tests. Now the government needs to follow that example!

    << Previous Day 2005/09/18
    [Calendar]
    Next Day >>

About LiveJournal.com

Advertisement